Are you 24 or older?

Help us verify your age by providing an honest response. This site contains gambling advertising for 24+.

Age-restricted content

You’re not old enough to view betting content. You’ll be redirected to the homepage.

alt
Advertisement
Explore Betting on GOAL
Arsenal FC v Hull City - Premier League 2026/27Getty Images

Why Arsenal should have been awarded a penalty against Hull despite Kai Havertz being offside

Advertisement

Arsenal denied penalty after lengthy VAR review against Hull

Arsenal were on top for much of the first half and thought they had a chance to score from 12 yards when Havertz went down in the box under a challenge from Mendy. Play continued, but the incident was assessed by VAR for a number of minutes before Hallam was advised to consult the pitchside monitor.

The VAR told the referee that Mendy had clearly held the striker's shirt, but that Havertz was offside at the time, so the foul could not be given.

Emirates celebrations turn to anger as Arteta confronts officials

When Hallam announced the decision, he spoke of the foul by the Hull centre-back first, and the home faithful cheered the penalty they thought was coming. Their delight turned to disappointment in the blink of an eye when he explained that Hull would instead take a free kick for offside.

A Premier League statement read: "VAR recommended an on-field review for a potential penalty to Arsenal for a challenge by Mendy on Havertz - but determined that Havertz was in an offside position in the build-up." The call sparked outrage among the Arsenal players and on the bench, with Arteta having stern words with the fourth official before the teams went in goalless at the break.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Why VAR got the Havertz offside call wrong

It soon emerged that the rules were on Arsenal's side. BBC Sport's football issues correspondent Dale Johnson said: "That is a very controversial VAR intervention at the Emirates. A player who is in an offside position only becomes active when they commit an offside offence. Kai Havertz must be 'attempting to play the ball, or challenging an opponent for the ball' - otherwise the shirt pull by Nobel Mendy takes precedence. The foul comes before any offside offence.

Related Topics

Premier League Matches

"Havertz did not commit an offside offence, and this should have been a spot-kick to Arsenal regardless of the offside. We saw this a couple of seasons ago between Newcastle and Bournemouth. Fabian Schar was just offside but pulled back as he moved to run onto a free-kick delivery. A penalty was awarded after a VAR review."

What next for Arsenal in the second half against Hull?

The decision leaves the defending champions with a real sense of injustice at half-time.

Advertisement

Arteta's side must now turn that frustration into a breakthrough after the restart, and if the goal does not come, the questions for the officials will only grow louder.

News editor

Working as a football journalist was my first childhood dream. I became a journalist and a member of the Egyptian Journalists Syndicate, but covering topics far from the world of sports until the opportunity came in early 2020 when I joined Kooora, and then GOAL.

My memories with football began with Zinedine Zidane's historic triumph in the 1998 World Cup and France's unforgettable win over Brazil in the final, along with the Egyptian league matches and the rivalry between Al Ahly, Zamalek, and Ismaily during that era.

I don't support a specific team in Europe, but I enjoyed watching Milan with "Maldini, Gattuso, Kaka, Pirlo" and was amazed by Barcelona with "Busquets, Iniesta, Xavi, Neymar, Villa, Messi, Suarez", before following Mohamed Salah in his exceptional career with Fiorentina, Roma, and Liverpool.

My unforgettable sports moment was Mohamed Aboutrika's goal in Al Ahly's victory over Sfaxien in the 2006 CAF Champions League final.

My ideal lineup: Buffon; Cafu - Van Dijk - Maldini - Roberto Carlos; Pirlo - Zidane - Iniesta - Kaka; Cristiano Ronaldo - Messi

View Author Profile