Arsenal's loss to Lyon on Thursday drew many talking points – one being the controversy of the game's only goal.
Melvine Malard was clearly in an offside position as she interfered with play in an incident that led to Frida Maanum inadvertently putting the ball in the back of her own net. It's a goal that Juventus, in particular, could be left ruing.
Had VAR been in use, it would have given the officials another chance to make a decision.
Arsenal head coach Jonas Eidevall's post-match comments highlighted some of the inconsistencies around the use of technology in the UWCL, which does not help officials.
“Firstly, goal-line technology is available but only if you pay for it yourselves," Eidevall explained. "So, we paid for it today as we think it should be [used], but not all clubs in the competition can afford to pay for it and I think it’s weird.
"It’s also weird to say VAR is important in the UWCL from quarter-finals onwards," he added, referring to the fact it will be used in the knockout rounds – but not before. "Is it not important in the group stages?
"Either you say no VAR or you do VAR the whole way through. Same thing with goal-line technology. It is in the fairness of the competition.”
This is meant to be the most premium club competition in women's football. These should not be problems - yet they are. Until UEFA fixes them, they will continue to generate headlines for all the wrong reasons.