On X, Dean said: "As someone who goes [to] the match this sounds awful. The referee does signals to show their decision and we don't need it to be more detailed than that. We're at the match to support the team, not examine the decisions. Have VAR discussions available live publicly, not this theatre."
Thomas Wilkie echoed: "Absolutely pointless. We know what the decision is as soon as the ref signals what's going on. Fans need to be able to hear the conversations between Officials and VAR. Instead of being sat in the stadium with no clue as to what's being reviewed."
Danny P commented: "This is spectacularly braindead. It fails to solve a problem that doesn't even exist. Just pandering to morons, and they still won't see it positively. Referee hand signals are fine for every other decision (including after discussions with on-field assistants)."
But not all were against it, as Luke Penning said: "The sooner in-stadium VAR announcements happen the better, as a fan in a stadium when VAR happens apart from some message on the screen, it seems all very detached currently."
With VAR not used in the Carabao Cup prior to the semis, Northampton Eagle suggested it should have happened sooner: "It's a bit late. It should've been done in the quarter-finals. Arsenal's second goal would have been ruled offside, as it should have been!"