Are you 24 or older?

Help us verify your age by providing an honest response. This site contains gambling advertising for 24+.

Age-restricted content

You’re not old enough to view betting content. You’ll be redirected to the homepage.

alt

This page contains affiliate links. When you purchase through the links provided, we may earn a commission.

+19 | Please play responsibly | T&C's Apply | Commercial Content  | Publishing Principles
Federico Chiesa Juventus 2022-23Getty

Revealed: How much Federico Chiesa transfer will cost Liverpool as Reds ready bid for Juventus forward

  • Italy international wanted at Anfield
  • Bianconeri set asking price
  • Klopp also keen on Celta midfielder

WHAT HAPPENED? The Reds are looking to strengthen their ranks at Anfield following a 2022-23 campaign in which they could only muster a fifth-place finish in the Premier League and missed out on Champions League qualification. Euro 2020-winning Italy international forward Chiesa is now registering on their recruitment radar.

THE BIGGER PICTURE: Gazzetta dello Sport claims that Liverpool are preparing to move for the talented 25-year-old, but only value him at around €40m-45m - which sits some way short of Juve’s asking price. The Serie A giants may be talked into doing a deal as they cannot afford to meet the demands of a new contract for Chiesa.

AND WHAT'S MORE: Meanwhile, Mundo Deportivo reports that Liverpool are also expressing interest in Celta Vigo midfielder Gabri Veiga. The 21-year-old registered 11 goals and four assists last season and has a €40m (£34m/$43m) release clause in his contract. Chelsea are another side keeping a close eye on the exciting youngster's development.

IN THREE PHOTOS:

WHAT NEXT? Liverpool are expected to be busy in the summer window, and already have a deal for Argentine World Cup winner Alexis Mac Allister wrapped up, with Jurgen Klopp seeking to bolster his ranks across the board.

ENJOYED THIS STORY?

Add GOAL.com as a preferred source on Google to see more of our reporting

Add as preferred source on Google