Reece James picked up a four-game ban after his second red card of the season and Chelsea tried desperately to overturn the suspension.
Article continues below
Article continues below
Article continues below
Chelsea make bizarre claim on James ban appeal
Blues say James was disoriented
FA turn down appeal and uphold four-game ban
(C)Getty Images
WHAT HAPPENED?
In their penultimate match of the 2023/24 Premier League season, Chelsea saw their captain sent off for a reckless kickout at Brighton's Joao Pedro. The straight red card was his second of the season, which automatically brought about a four-match ban. The suspension was appealed by Chelsea who made a bizarre claim of innocence in defence of the 24-year-old.
WHAT WAS CHELSEA'S CLAIM?
As per an exclusive report by the Daily Mail, Chelsea claimed that James was "disoriented" after being fouled from behind, and Pedro "made contact" first as he sprinted past their captain, adding that "it had not been his intention to harm Mr Pedro, he was simply pushing him away with his foot." The FA dismissed the appeal because they did not find the defender's story to be "persuasive." They also rejected the idea that the defender was disoriented when he caught the Brazilian slightly below the knee, calling the action "unnecessary" and dismissing the idea that he was merely "pushing" Pedro away.