He told Prime Casino: "The amount of times I've had these conversations with England, players generally love playing for their country. Ultimately, like club football, you can only determine whether it's good or bad if you win something or in the Premier League if you qualify for the Champions League or something like that. I think the thing with Gareth with many people... It seems quite binary. You either like him or you don't, or you think he's done well or you don't. I don't think there's too many middle ground people I've spoken to.
"The way that opinion has either changed or reinforced is on how Thomas Tuchel does. If Thomas was to go on and be successful, win the World Cup, then all of a sudden Gareth wasn't good enough because we should have won the World Cup before. If Thomas doesn't, then Gareth was great because Thomas couldn't do it. I think that's kind of... Everyone's on pause.
"I think he laid the groundwork, the foundations or the FA as well, to make England competitive and virtue of a couple of moments, which ultimately most sport is decided by, we're talking about an England side that still haven't won anything since ‘66. However, I think there's a belief we as fans expect realistically, rather than just expect because we had good players. As I say, if Thomas, and I like what he's done already in the first couple of games, if Thomas is to be successful, then there won't be too much talk about Gareth, naturally, because all the talk will be about Thomas Tuchel and what he's achieved."