Are you 24 or older?

Help us verify your age by providing an honest response. This site contains gambling advertising for 24+.

Age-restricted content

You’re not old enough to view betting content. You’ll be redirected to the homepage.

alt

This page contains affiliate links. When you purchase through the links provided, we may earn a commission.

+18 | Commercial Content | T&C's Apply | Play Responsibly | Publishing Principles
Al Hilal v Al Taawoun: Saudi Pro LeagueGetty Images Sport
Translated by

Refereeing expert drops a bombshell: Al-Hilal were denied a penalty against Al-Taawoun

Referee advisor Mohamed Foda dropped a bombshell regarding the refereeing controversy in the Al-Hilal v Al-Taawoun match, which took place yesterday, Saturday, in Round 27 of the Roshen Professional League, after revealing his decisive opinion on whether ‘The Leader’ deserved a penalty during the match.

With this result, Al-Hilal dropped another two points in the title race, taking their tally to 65 points in second place, level with third-placed Al-Ahli Jeddah, and five points behind Al-Nassr.

Fouda said in comments on the programme “Action with Walid”: “Al-Hilal deserved a penalty in the 78th minute of the second half, following a clear foul on the Brazilian Marcos Leonardo.”

Read also... Inzaghi: Al-Taawoun were lucky... and Al-Hilal are struggling!
Read also... Video... Al-Shneif: The absence of Al-Dossari and Savic exposed Inzaghi!
Read also... Video... Al-Hilal legend: The Leader has lost its identity under Inzaghi

He added: “The referee turned a blind eye to the incident and was not consulted by the VAR, even though the Al-Taawoun defender brought down Leonardo, as his right foot was not in a natural position.”

It is worth noting that the Al-Hilal vs Al-Taawoun match saw several controversial refereeing decisions amid the fierce battle for the league title.

ENJOYED THIS STORY?

Add GOAL.com as a preferred source on Google to see more of our reporting

Follow GOAL on Google