UEFA demands transparency on World Cup sell-off
The walls appear to be closing in on FIFA president as the global governing body has officially agreed to open its books to council members. This dramatic shift comes in direct response to an ultimatum issued by UEFA, which had demanded full disclosure regarding the aborted plan to involve private investors in the World Cup.
The European body had set a firm deadline of November 2 for FIFA to provide clarity on its governance and the decision-making processes that led to the controversial FIFA Forward Enterprise (FFE) proposal.
Infantino had previously issued a formal apology for the failed scheme during a recent council meeting, but his refusal to provide a detailed explanation at the time left many member associations dissatisfied. Instead of an open forum, the president had requested that all inquiries be submitted in writing. However, the pressure from Nyon became impossible to ignore, leading to a late-night intervention from the FIFA hierarchy to avoid a total breakdown in relations between the two most powerful organisations in world football.
Strict conditions for document review in Zurich
In a letter sent just hours before the UEFA-imposed deadline, FIFA secretary general Mattias Grafstrom informed council members that the requested paperwork would be made available for scrutiny. However, the offer comes with significant strings attached, as the documents will not be distributed digitally. Instead, officials must travel to FIFA’s headquarters in Zurich to view the files in person under strict confidentiality protocols. Members have been given a two-week window to register their interest in reviewing the material, according to reports from BBC Sport.
FIFA maintains that these restrictive measures are necessary to uphold legal obligations and protect sensitive information. Internal sources suggest that the governing body found UEFA’s demand to answer over 100 questions within a fortnight to be "unfeasible," citing their heavy workload in organising youth tournaments and preparing for an upcoming extraordinary congress. Furthermore, FIFA’s legal team has reportedly advised caution due to ongoing litigation in the United States, where UEFA has sought the disclosure of evidence that could potentially lead to criminal complaints in Switzerland.
FIFA POWER RANKINGS
Related Topics
Broader governance concerns and election pressure
The dispute over the FFE project is only one aspect of a wider dissatisfaction with Infantino’s current administration. UEFA’s strongly worded letter highlighted a range of grievances, including the controversial decision to award the inaugural FIFA Peace Prize to Donald Trump and the handling of Folarin Balogun's suspension.
\The letter stated: "The withdrawal of FFE, the acknowledgement of mistakes and the announcement of 'potential governance reforms' do not answer how the relevant decisions were taken or why the FIFA Council was not involved at the appropriate stage."
This push for transparency arrives at a critical juncture for Infantino, who is eyeing re-election next year. The November 18 deadline for rival candidates to declare their intentions is fast approaching, and UEFA’s aggressive stance is widely seen as an attempt to weaken the incumbent's position.


.png?quality=60&auto=webp&format=pjpg)
.png?quality=60&auto=webp&format=pjpg)
%20(3).png?quality=60&auto=webp&format=pjpg)
%20(3).png?quality=60&auto=webp&format=pjpg)
%20(1).png?quality=60&auto=webp&format=pjpg)