The potential shift in schedule has been heavily debated within MLS and its observers. Several coaches and executives shared their thoughts on the possible change during the league's Media Day in January.
"I think the price you pay in a different transfer window, it's a lot more challenging in the winter where it doesn't align with the European calendar," FC Cincinnati's Pat Noonan said in expressing his support. "So I think if those align, it becomes easier as far as the recruitment process and how you can go about getting top players without overextending [in transfer fees] as far as what you're paying."
There's also a perceived advantage in terms of recruiting players.
"From a recruitment standpoint, it's massive," Pat Onstead, Houston Dynamo GM, added. "It will be a big change if we can do this as a league, it'll really help us be able to recruit the top players and bring them into our league."
LAFC co-managing owner Larry Berg spoke on the record after the meeting, which he characterized as “an opportunity for the league to present and recommend some big, bold moves.”
He told SBJ that owners had the chance to “respond as to how they take those moves and give the league a sense whether it’s worth continuing to work on them” as well as to “point out the challenges that need to be worked on to get to a final vote in the future.”
Some proponents will view this as a missed opportunity to make a statement about the future of the league when all eyes are on soccer following the FIFA Men’s World Cup next summer. Garber dismissed this notion.
“My view is, if we can get this done, we’ll fully be able to capitalize on the momentum of the World Cup,” Garber said. “I’m not remotely concerned about it. Making this change will be one of the biggest decisions MLS will have made in its history.”