“George impeded the goalkeeper. So, here if you challenge the goalkeeper, an infringement has occurred,” he said in his analysis on Soccerzone.
“You see an assistant referee correctly positioned and the referee, but you see George not playing the ball, he plays the goalkeeper. When you challenge the goalkeeper inside the goal area, now flags comes out to say I have seen an infringement from George. You can see the infringement for yourself.
“The linesman now says I saw a foul, but the referee says I didn’t see a foul. Now, what happens after here is that the review committee will sit and determine the correct decision.
“Here on Soccerzone we can tell you now that the correct decision came from the assistant referee for a foul. So, this was not supposed to be given as a goal, it should’ve been given as a foul," Hlungwani concluded.