Mauricio Pochettino should learn from Ange Postecoglu if Chelsea are to close the gap on high-flying Tottenham

Both managers entered clubs that were close to breaking point in the summer, inheriting unhappy, disjointed squads that had underperformed significantly under the previous incumbents. Something that evidently topped their lists of priorities and underpinned their work throughout the summer and into the opening weeks of this season, then, was restoring some unity and fostering a togetherness. Both seem to have succeeded in good time.

Speaking recently, Pochettino said: "When you have an unsettled squad, always it's difficult and you lose time and then you need time to recover the time you lose. That's where we are. Maybe our performances are good but you need [something] extra, which is mental — a connection. It's energy to be all together, not to have different agendas in the squad. We need time to build that togetherness that you need when you are competing at this level."

Talking about the unity at Tottenham, newly-named club captain Son Heung-min said: "This is [being a] part of family. We are getting really, really tight in the changing room. Everyone is working for each other, running for each other, fighting for each other."

As renowned man-managers, it's little surprise that both have already managed to lift the gloom in their respective dressing rooms, but it seems to be a story of two very different approaches that have both yielded success.

Pochettino clearly likes to be hands-on and familiar with his Chelsea players, and his handling of Mykhailo Mudryk - who was bereft of confidence when the manager arrived but has had his self-esteem restored over the weeks and months since - is a shining example of that. The Argentine has taken the Ukrainian under his wing, worked with him on a one-on-one basis, even playing crossbar challenge with the winger, and provided support as both a manager and a friend.

Postecoglou, meanwhile, has been watchful from a distance, giving the Tottenham players more responsibility off the field as a collective in an attempt to empower them as individuals. The Australian said recently: "A lot of it has to be player-driven. I can sit there and paint the prettiest of pictures but they need to believe in it, they have to buy into it. As I keep saying, it’s their dressing room. They go there every day. I don’t go into the dressing room. And the environment is going to be key to us being successful."

That is largely where the similarities between the two coaches' journeys to this point end. After a slow start and having ridden their luck at times, Postecoglou has his side battling right at the top of the Premier League as we enter November and - more importantly in the eyes of many a Spurs fan - they are back to playing the front-footed, attacking brand of football last seen under (you guessed it) Pochettino.

Things have not been so smooth for Pochettino and Chelsea. On his return to English football, the Tottenham favourite oversaw the Blues' worst start to a season in 45 yearsin the midst of an injury crisis. There were always the shoots of recovery, though, as Chelsea vastly underperformed their xG, and they enjoyed a timely resurgence in October as they hallmarks of Pochettino's MO began to shine through.

However, a dire home defeat to Brentford seems to have knocked them back to square one.

One of the main obstacles to immediate success for Pochettino - as was always likely to be the case - has been integrating a raft of new signings after overseeing a fire sale of unhappy and unwanted players.

His north London counterpart benefitted from very few of the club's regular first-team starters moving on, and Postecoglou signed off on just a few targeted signings to improve the side in certain areas of the pitch, such as James Maddison.

Pochettino, meanwhile, has had to contend with 21 outgoings, including the likes of Mason Mount and N'Golo Kante, whom he surely would have wanted to work with, as well as 11 newcomers - the vast majority of whom were young and unproven in the Premier League. Getting them to gel was never going to be instantaneous, and the head coach has already lamented the amount of business done in the summer. "At the moment, I think we are a young team, a young team means too many changes in the summer because of the circumstances and we are suffering – sometimes good and bad results, but performances are consistent," he said.

When you also factor in the malaise that enveloped Stamford Bridge throughout a nightmarish 2022-23 campaign on and off the field, it is little surprise that it has taken four months to see even the earliest signs of improvement at Chelsea.

That is not to detract from Postecoglou's work, however; three of Tottenham's main summer signings in Maddison, Micky van de Ven and Guglielmo Vicario, as well as returning loanee Destiny Udogie, have all been performing at an exceptional level from the off, which is a complete anomaly in the unpredictable world of transfer dealings.

Of course, one man who did leave Tottenham this summer is arguably the greatest player in the club's history: Harry Kane. His protracted £100 million ($121m) exit to Bayern Munich was expected to be hammer blow to Spurs and their aspirations this season, but, remarkably, they haven't looked back.

Postecoglou never seemed to truly believe that Kane would be at the club beyond the summer, and thus it's clear he'd been meticulously planning behind the scenes. So far it has been a study in how to handle the absence of a prolific goalscorer despite the fact the club didn't really replace Kane, although he has been able to lean upon a top-class attacking player in Son, who has shifted to a central role.

While he has had other problems to contend with, Pochettino has dealt less ably with Chelsea's own lack of a proven No.9, tinkering with personnel and formations in a bid to find a solution when it doesn't seem like there is one while they don't have a focal point.

Before they inevitably spend on one, Pochettino still has a lot of work to do to instil the kind of attacking freedom and confidence that Postecoglou has brought to Tottenham with such ease.

One thing that is abundantly clear is that the pressures of managing Chelsea and Tottenham are entirely different; after their flirtations with so-called elite managers Jose Mourinho and Antonio Conte following Pochettino's exit in 2019, Spurs and their fanbase seem to have come to the realisation that an entertaining, attacking brand of football is all they ever really wanted, regardless of who is in charge, and whether tangible success accompanies that is actually of little consequence.

At Chelsea, meanwhile, the 20-year-old business model of short managerial cycles, heavy spending, short-term success, and firing and hiring has created a highly-pressurised environment, with supporters demanding attractive football and silverware each and every season.

That is what Pochettino has inherited and must shoulder, while his counterpart in north London is able to work without expectation to mould his team in his image. Very few people expected the Australian to succeed in the first place, but expectations may change if he can mastermind a victory over Pochettino.