A controversial refereeing incident marred the King's Cup clash between Al-Ahli and Al-Anwar, with "Al-Raqi" awarded a goal despite a handball in the build-up.
Edvard Sperstyan struck it. The Armenian unleashed a powerful shot that flew into Al-Anwar's net, handing his side the advantage and pushing them towards the next round.
Read also.. Transfer market earthquake: Al-Ittihad move to snatch Kessié in the final moments
Controversy followed. Replays showed Brazilian Roger Ibañez handle the ball before the attack that ended with Sperstyan's finish.
Refereeing expert Fahad Al-Mirdasi settled the matter on the "Nadeena" programme, insisting the goal should not have stood because of an offence at the start of the build-up.
Al-Mirdasi said: "Al-Ahli's goal is not valid, because there is a handball by Ibañez, the Al-Ahli player, at the start of the build-up of the attack", adding that the offence came directly before the goal and should have seen it disallowed.
Sperstyan's strike was a beauty, but it sparked a refereeing storm all the same. Al-Mirdasi believes Ibañez's handball rendered the attack invalid, and the moment stands as one of the most talked-about incidents of the Al-Ahli and Al-Anwar tie.