Who's watching the World Cup?
One can scarcely imagine this kind of campaign surrounding other sports or events. The Super Bowl relies too heavily on an American audience; rugby and cricket don't stand a chance; even the Olympics is too decentralised in its dramas to truly attract the world. But the World Cup? All the cliches are true: in most countries, normal life stops.
Housewives who haven't watched a game in years - four years, to be exact - sit beside husbands in front of the TV. Entire villages will gather around the civic set to catch a glimpse of the action. Countries where football already borders on the religious will show unparalleled levels of devotion, with more than a few sick days at work called in, appointments missed and phones switched off.
No wonder the advertisers love the image so much. It is, in our decentralised, digital age, a reminder of our shared humanity, what television might have been, what sport still can be.
But what advertisers love even more is us watching ourselves. That means more advertising revenue. And if the World Cup isn't the best chance there is to catch us all in front of the TV...
In View - Fifa's marketing machine depends heavily on TV audiences
Now, that said, it's not really all of us. In fact, it's not even most of us. FIFA used to claim figures of the orders of billions watching each game. Using modern research techniques, various organisations have settled on the viewing figures for the last World Cups. While not of the magnitudes previously claimed, they still make for impressive reading.
According to Sponsorship Intelligence, an agency whose figures FIFA itself relies on, 715.1 million people - give or take, one in ten people alive at the time - watched the last showpiece final. How accurate this figure is is open to debate when one considers the difficulties in gauging audiences in Africa and Asia, as well as those millions who watch the match in a communal setting such as a bar, or even at work.
Some would even argue that this itself is a high estimate. After all, it's said to include those who watch a repeat later. 400 million for live viewers may be closer to the truth, but measuring those out-of-home viewers is the real problem.
Indeed, with the number of people watching in cafes, bars, town squares and even fanzones around the world, the ripple effect will be felt far beyond living rooms.
And that's before we even think about the tournament as a whole. FIFA, after much wrangling, settled on a figure of 26.29 billion cumulative World Cup views - comfortably enough for everyone on the planet to have watched more than three matches. The vast majority of these were in-home, at 24.2 billion.
These figures put the World Cup streets ahead of any other sporting competition's verifiable figures, including the Olympic Games and the Super Bowl. That's not too surprising in the case of the latter: despite the gargantuan status of American Football's biggest prize, the last World Cup was broadcast in 214 countries and territories and thus has a global reach that even the Olympics would struggle to match.
This year, FIFA expect to see an increased audience. One helpful fact is that, with the games taking place on South African time, those football-crazy countries in Europe will be able to watch all the games during daytime and evening hours. This was the case in 2006, but not in 2002 when the tournament was held in Japan and South Korea. Furthermore, that the tournament is not attracting quite the number of travelers that was first expected will see many more watching it at home.
Indeed, compare these untold billions of television viewers to the fewer-than-four-million fans expected at the stadiums and it's clear that football is, as much as it is the world's game, the TV's game. For better or for worse!
Become a fan of Goal.com International on Facebook! Just click onto Facebook.com/Goal to join the beautiful game's leading fan community...