The Manchester United forward provided the assist for Daniel Sturridge's goal but missed a golden chance to equalise as calls for him to be benched grow stronger
By Richard Jolly
After 631 minutes of football, spread over eight years and three tournaments, Wayne Rooney finally did it. He finally contributed to a goal in a World Cup ... and yet the triumph was temporary, the relief brief. The problem was that he did not score one.
It is an exaggeration to say that he cost England a point. It is nevertheless very possible that they would have avoided defeat had he found the bottom corner of the Italian net.
|ENGLAND SOCIAL HUB
|Keep up with all the latest Three Lions news and get involved in the debate on Twitter with our new England Social Hub|
It only took 10 minutes to put Rooney's achievement of ending one of his droughts into context. Already displaced from his favoured position behind the main striker by the precocious Raheem Sterling, he was then shunted from left to right flank because Danny Welbeck was trusted rather more to control a raiding right-back, Matteo Darmian. He is sliding down the pecking order.
Hodgson's half-time switch had unwitting echoes of Sir Alex Ferguson's decision, 15 months earlier, to prefer Welbeck against Real Madrid. The lesser player, the limited player, is the man whom managers believe can do the donkey work. Rooney, who ought to be the thoroughbred, has instead become the conundrum.
Hodgson, like his three predecessors, has invested his faith in Rooney. Yet, tellingly, he opted for potential over pedigree, Sterling rather than Rooney, in the pivotal central role. He was rewarded by the teenager, not by the senior figure. An assist and a couple of classy cross-field passes apart, it was a frustrating night, summed up when he halted Ross Barkley's solo run only to shoot over. It already seems a safe bet that, whenever England's campaign ends, the next generation will be deemed the winners. 'Wazza' may never be Gazza, the star of an England World Cup.
He was not charged with emulating an icon. Instead, he was cast at the start as Graham Rix. In 1982, Ron Greenwood selected the Arsenal man on the left of midfield to track back against West German right-back Manfred Kaltz. He was criticised for it, although Rix negated the full-back in a stalemate. Rooney failed to ensure a repeat.
His nemesis was Darmian, the lowest-profile member of Italy's starting XI. Rooney's wanderings meant that Leighton Baines was left exposed whenever the Torino man advanced. Despite his famous fondness for appearing in the left-back position to make the occasional tackle, the Manchester United star cannot be relied upon to double up time and again.
Rewind to the past and, in 2009, Terry Venables, no mean judge of a footballer, suggested that Rooney could be the best left winger in the world. That was his final season of selfless sacrifice to permit Cristiano Ronaldo to do whatever he wanted. Since then, the idea has been overlooked. The Rooney fixation has involved the idea that he must be a No.10 for club and country.
|World Cup Infographics|
|Uncover the statistics behind the World Cup with our new Unibet infographic series|
Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain, who may be fit by Friday, sparkled on the right against Ecuador. Given Adam Lallana's ability to operate on either wing and Barkley's promising cameo, it puts his place in question. The view that many have is simple: if Rooney does not start in the centre, he should not play at all.
Popular opinion is turning against Rooney – the knee-jerk reactions on social media were to call for his head – but it would be Hodgson's boldest decision yet to omit him (and, predictably, the England manager insisted that he played well).
The reality is that there is no simple solution. He was neither such a revelation to guarantee a starting spot on the flanks or such a disaster to justify demands that he be dropped.
So how do you solve a problem like Wayne? After a decade of trying, England are no nearer to knowing the answer.