|
|
Aussie Analysis: The Meaning Of Australia's Highest Ever FIFA Ranking
Pride aside, the practical applications of Australia's FIFA Ranking could be crucial to the Socceroos' chances in South Africa, writes Goal.com's Chris Paraskevas.
Jul 6, 2009 1:40:26 AM
Much has been written of Australia’s highest ever official FIFA ranking, coming in at 16th in the world, notably ahead of the likes of Turkey and Portugal.
Whether Australia is capable of beating either of these sides is trivial – the fact remains that, as far as seeding goes for future qualification stages and the World Cup itself, the Socceroos currently have the edge.
Some pundits and commentators are quick to dismiss the rankings as nothing more than an elaborate misrepresentation – Gabon’s presence inside the top 50 is to those people, justification of the claim – but their practical importance remains understated.
Whether FIFA relies on their latest rankings to seed teams for the draw for the 2010 World Cup Finals remains to be seen - they did so partly, along with performances of nations at previous World Cups, in 2006.
From that perspective, regardless of subjective feelings about the realism of the rankings, they are crucial to Australia.
Members of the Socceroos squad have been quick to point out that their chances of progressing past the group stages in South Africa will be dependent upon the luck of the draw, as much as they seem keen to repeat the phrase that they are “quietly confident”.
Coming in at 16th in the rankings might just be the difference in determining whether they are drawn in the ominous ‘Group of Death’.
Perhaps this would explain why Pim Verbeek has been so keen to continue with his pragmatic style during the final two matches of the qualification campaign, which Australia both won – does the Dutchman already have one eye on the draw for the finals?
Aside from possible use of the rankings in determining the draw in South Africa – a system which drew inevitable criticism in 2006 in any case – to what use can we put Australia’s current standing?
Many will point to the fact that the announcement of Australia’s historic placing has arrived at the perfect moment, as Football Federation Australia (FFA) launches bids for the 2018 and 2022 World Cups.
In the eyes of the football world, a successful qualifying campaign, coupled with a historic achievement has put Australia above some of European football’s traditional heavyweights.
Surely the land down under is slightly more difficult to ignore now than it was 12 months ago?
Closer scrutiny would likely reveal however that the mentioning Australia’s ranking is little more than political correctness within the complex bidding world that FFA Chairman Frank Lowy now inhabits.
Yours truly asked Lowy at a press conference announcing the government’s subsidizing of the bid how important the Socceroos performances would be in relation to the bid, to which he replied that they would be crucial throughout 2009 and at the World Cup itself in 2010.
It’s hard to argue with the man heading Australia’s bid, simply because he is indeed the man heading Australia’s bid and now has more experience than most in what it will take to bring the biggest sporting event in the world to this country.
But one can’t escape the feeling that the performance of the national team and in particular, a disputed rankings system, will not form any significant part of the criteria for bidders (South Korea and Japan could hardly have been considered powerhouses before winning the rights to co-host the 2002 World Cup).
With the practical applications of the ranking now covered, where does that leave Australia and its lofty self?
Arguably there is a point of pride in being the Asian Football Confederation’s highest placed nation, with Japan some way back in 40th and Korea Republic having just snuck into the top 50, coming in at 48th.
Within Australia’s own borders, being officially named inside the world’s top 20 can only bring positive publicity to the game as it continues to assert itself within mainstream sports media – though the Socceroos have historically had little trouble in that regard.
Essentially, there can be no definitive answer as to the meaning of Australia’s ranking for the moment; things will become much more clear 12 months from now, when Australia is truly tested on football’s greatest stage and when FIFA decide whether the much-criticized system will still be used to decide whether the Socceroos line up against Brazil or Gabon – who lead their respective qualifying group - in South Africa.
Chris Paraskevas, Goal.com
All the Australian soccer coverage you need on the Goal.com Australia homepage!
Whether Australia is capable of beating either of these sides is trivial – the fact remains that, as far as seeding goes for future qualification stages and the World Cup itself, the Socceroos currently have the edge.
Some pundits and commentators are quick to dismiss the rankings as nothing more than an elaborate misrepresentation – Gabon’s presence inside the top 50 is to those people, justification of the claim – but their practical importance remains understated.
Whether FIFA relies on their latest rankings to seed teams for the draw for the 2010 World Cup Finals remains to be seen - they did so partly, along with performances of nations at previous World Cups, in 2006.
From that perspective, regardless of subjective feelings about the realism of the rankings, they are crucial to Australia.
Members of the Socceroos squad have been quick to point out that their chances of progressing past the group stages in South Africa will be dependent upon the luck of the draw, as much as they seem keen to repeat the phrase that they are “quietly confident”.
Coming in at 16th in the rankings might just be the difference in determining whether they are drawn in the ominous ‘Group of Death’.
Perhaps this would explain why Pim Verbeek has been so keen to continue with his pragmatic style during the final two matches of the qualification campaign, which Australia both won – does the Dutchman already have one eye on the draw for the finals?
Aside from possible use of the rankings in determining the draw in South Africa – a system which drew inevitable criticism in 2006 in any case – to what use can we put Australia’s current standing?
Many will point to the fact that the announcement of Australia’s historic placing has arrived at the perfect moment, as Football Federation Australia (FFA) launches bids for the 2018 and 2022 World Cups.
In the eyes of the football world, a successful qualifying campaign, coupled with a historic achievement has put Australia above some of European football’s traditional heavyweights.
Surely the land down under is slightly more difficult to ignore now than it was 12 months ago?
Closer scrutiny would likely reveal however that the mentioning Australia’s ranking is little more than political correctness within the complex bidding world that FFA Chairman Frank Lowy now inhabits.
Yours truly asked Lowy at a press conference announcing the government’s subsidizing of the bid how important the Socceroos performances would be in relation to the bid, to which he replied that they would be crucial throughout 2009 and at the World Cup itself in 2010.
It’s hard to argue with the man heading Australia’s bid, simply because he is indeed the man heading Australia’s bid and now has more experience than most in what it will take to bring the biggest sporting event in the world to this country.
But one can’t escape the feeling that the performance of the national team and in particular, a disputed rankings system, will not form any significant part of the criteria for bidders (South Korea and Japan could hardly have been considered powerhouses before winning the rights to co-host the 2002 World Cup).
With the practical applications of the ranking now covered, where does that leave Australia and its lofty self?
Arguably there is a point of pride in being the Asian Football Confederation’s highest placed nation, with Japan some way back in 40th and Korea Republic having just snuck into the top 50, coming in at 48th.
Within Australia’s own borders, being officially named inside the world’s top 20 can only bring positive publicity to the game as it continues to assert itself within mainstream sports media – though the Socceroos have historically had little trouble in that regard.
Essentially, there can be no definitive answer as to the meaning of Australia’s ranking for the moment; things will become much more clear 12 months from now, when Australia is truly tested on football’s greatest stage and when FIFA decide whether the much-criticized system will still be used to decide whether the Socceroos line up against Brazil or Gabon – who lead their respective qualifying group - in South Africa.
Chris Paraskevas, Goal.com
All the Australian soccer coverage you need on the Goal.com Australia homepage!
Make Your Prediction
Oman - Australia
Oman
Australia
Prediction Submitted
Most Popular Predictions
-
Oman 0-2 Australia
- 15.71 %
-
Oman 1-2 Australia
- 11.43 %
-
Oman 0-1 Australia
- 10 %
Inside Goal.Com
-
EURO 2012: Cristiano Ronaldo, Xavi and Van Persie named in Goal.com's dream team XI
Goal.com put together its dream team for this summer's European Championship in Poland and Ukraine
-
RIGG: Anelka struggling against the current in Shanghai
Nicolas Anelka went against the grain when he moved to Shanghai. Now he's finding that coaching and gelling tactically is like swimming against the tide.
-
ROGERS: Bradley should command a bidding war among Serie A teams
Chievo is currently shopping the American midfielder and several Italian clubs have shown interest.
-
ISOLA: Neymar-led Brazil should be considered the 2014 WC favorite
Neymar was brilliant as Brazil easily handled the United States with early World Cup preparations officially underway.
-
LATHAM: Mexico using summer friendlies to build depth
With World Cup qualifying to begin in June, Mexico is using three U.S.-hosted friendlies to build squad depth.