The Netherlands boss reveals that he would have turned to the Newcastle goalkeeper once more if he had had a substitution left prior to the penalty shootout against Argentina
Netherlands coach Louis van Gaal admits that he would have replaced goalkeeper Jasper Cillessen with Tim Krul again prior to the penalty shootout against Argentina if he had not already made three substitutions.
Krul came off the bench in the final minute of extra time in the quarter-final against Costa Rica and promptly made two saves as Oranje squeezed through.
But Van Gaal had already made his full allocation of changes in the 120 minutes and Cillessen was unable to replicate the Newcastle star's heroics as Argentina advanced to a final against Germany 4-2 on penalties after a dire game had finished goalless after extra time.
|WORLD CUP SOCIAL HUB
|Keep up with all the latest news from Brazil and get involved in the debate on Twitter with our new World Cup Social Hub|
"I subbed [Daryl] Janmaat for [Bruno Martins] Indi because he had a yellow card already and was often too late and wasn't executing well.
"I didn’t want to take a risk on Nigel de Jong being injured and he was the free man in midfield and [Jordy] Clasie can play going forward better than Nigel. I subbed [Robin] van Persie because he was exhausted."
It was a disappointing exit for Netherlands but they exceeded expectations in reaching the last four and Van Gaal could not hide his pride in what they had achieved in Brazil.
"We had a fantastic tournament, as the Brazilian journalists have expressed," he enthused. "No-one expected us to make it through the group and, after that, we defeated Mexico, who are not easy to beat. Argentina are a top country with top players. Penalties are a matter of luck.
"It’s the most terrible scenario to lose on penalties. If anything, we were the better team, at least equal."
|World Cup Infographics|
|Uncover the statistics behind the World Cup with our new Unibet infographic series|
It is a fixture in which Van Gaal sees little value, as he declared: "I think this should never be played. I've said it for 10 years but we will still play and we have one less day to prepare, which is not fair.
"The worst thing, though, is that you can lose twice in a row after a tournament in which you have done marvellously well.
"You go home as a loser having lost twice, which is not right, but I’ve said this for 10, 15 years. You shouldn't have players play a match for third and fourth because there is only one award and that is for the champion."