|
|
World Cup Debate: Should Thierry Henry Be Made Accountable For His Hand Ball?
As we come to terms with France’s qualification to the 2010 World Cup, which indeed happened under acrimonious circumstances, Goal.com ponders as to whether ‘Titi’ Henry should at all be made liable to answer the critics...
This has once again sparked off the age-old talk of whether the ‘Fair Play’ exists if at all it does. There have been calls for video technology and tennis-like call for challenges though; the game’s governing body has always preferred manpower, which they plan to increase by placing two more to monitor the penalty-area incidents.
Back in June during the Confederations Cup, Egypt questioned referee Howard Webb as he awarded a last minute penalty to Brazil, which the African nation believed was taken by the assistance of the fourth official who might have checked the replays. Also the famous ‘headbutt’ which saw Zinedine Zidane end his glorious career disappointingly as referee Horacio Elizondo gave him marching orders which was claimed to have been influenced by a replay. FIFA has officially denied the use of technology in both the above mentioned incidents.
There have been a series of comments made by fans all over branding Henry as a “cheater” who had to resort to cheap tactics to help his side into the World Cup. Of course, it was a disgraceful incident that a contentious decision decided the fate of the game and even more so that a player of Thierry Henry’s repute was involved.

I Handled The Ball
"I will be honest, it was a handball," Henry admitted after the game. "But I am not the referee."
Is it the fallacy of the game? Or is it plainly that a player cheated to take his team into the World Cup? Under the current framework of rules, players often get away with such incidents and hence, make the most of it. They can’t resist the temptation.
Should a player be held responsible while it’s the governance (officiating) which was at fault? Even if we consider that the referee missed it, does it ethically allow players do indulge in such actions which are against the spirit of the game?
Personally, I think the player must be punished in order to set a standard and thereby, instill a fear amongst the other players that none can get away with such histrionics. One may question as to why it didn’t happen in the past. But it has to start somewhere and sometime. Arsenal’s Eduardo Da Silva was banned but it was later rescinded as not enough evidence was found against him.
Today, if Henry isn’t held responsible, tomorrow, players all across the world shall cite this instance and indulge further in using their hands in a game of the two feet.
Rahul Bali.
Let us know what YOU think? Should Henry be Punished?
Make Your Prediction
France - Estonia
Prediction Submitted
Most Popular Predictions
-
France 3-0 Estonia
- 21.4 %
-
France 4-0 Estonia
- 13.96 %
-
France 2-0 Estonia
- 13.2 %
-
Vote for your Goal.com World Player of the Week
Have your say on who you think should win Goal.com's weekly honour
-
Euro 2012 a timely respite for depressed Spain
With 24 per cent unemployment, wage cuts and little hope for improvement in the short term, the continental competition will at least take people's minds off their sad situation
-
Welbeck impresses but it's a bad day for Johnson
Ashley Young has also all but secured his place in the starting line up against France while Steven Gerrard put a good shift in. Here's how the Belgium friendly affected the England player's chances of featuring in Euro 2012
-
Five players Rodgers could sign for Liverpool
The new Reds boss was unveiled to the press on Friday and must immediately begin work on revitalising a thin squad with some additions in the transfer market
-
Lambert the latest in EPL manager merry-go-round
The Scot officially left Norwich City on Saturday to become the second new boss in June, following the appointment of Brendan Rodgers at Liverpool on Friday