The Arsenal manager comes out to defend the physical nature of the English game after the West Ham striker's collision with David de Gea on Wednesday drew criticism
The Liverpool striker, on loan at Upton Park, was criticised by Sir Alex Ferguson following a robust challenge on David de Gea.
|THE OTHER SIDE OF THE ARGUMENT
|Sir Alex Ferguson: Carroll challenge on De Gea an obvious red card|
"I don't have a problem with players who go in completely 100 per cent, because that is what you want to keep in the English game," he told the Daily Mirror. "It is a strength.
"Sometimes I watch foreign games and after 20 minutes you are bored because every time somebody goes down it is a foul, and you say: 'Come on!' That is not football, as well. We do not want to lose the strengths and what makes English football attractive but the intention of the players has to be fair.
"The physicality of the English game is one of the attractions of it," he continued. "I don't think it holds players back. In fact, the opposite, the foreign players who come to England improve and you get that aspect of the game as well.
|4/11||Arsenal are 4/11 with William Hill to finish in the Premier League top four
"It was worse 15 years ago than it is now. Fifteen years ago, no-one would have spoken about the Carroll challenge. Now everything is analysed on TV.
"Some players complained and then, after they moved away, they missed the English game.
"When you look at some players, you cannot say the physicality of the game stops them from displaying their talent.
"When I brought [Robert] Pires here he was not especially physical player but no-one could stop him from playing his game. [Marc] Overmars, [Dennis] Bergkamp - nobody could stop them.
"You cannot say it's physical or it's kicking, it's just that the commitment is high - and that's what you want."