Could Chelsea exile Lukaku have saved Di Matteo's job?

The Belgian has shown enough over the past six months to make some at Stamford Bridge wonder whether he could have been more than a wide-eyed understudy this term
By Liam Twomey

Given the events of this week, there is likely to be more than a hint of tension in the air when Chelsea host West Brom at Stamford Bridge on Saturday.

Rafa Benitez’s astonishing and explosive rant, having witnessed his side book a place in the FA Cup quarter-finals at the expense of Middlesbrough on Tuesday, means those present when Blues legend Steve Clarke comes to town with his Baggies side are almost certain to be treated to the surreal spectacle of the visiting manager cheered roundly while the man in the home dugout seeks refuge from the poisonous torrent of vitriol aimed in his direction.

Yet for all the disenchantment felt by Chelsea fans, perhaps the most frustrated spectator of all will be Romelu Lukaku. Denied the chance to feature for West Brom by the terms of his loan agreement, he may well look long and hard at the hapless, sorry figure of Fernando Torres and wonder why he has not yet been granted the chance to compete in a Blue shirt.



Possessed with the deluded and flawed notion that Torres would suddenly thrive in the absence of any meaningful competition, the Blues hierarchy had no inclination to take an active interest in their £18m signing’s footballing education. To their shame and substantial good fortune, Clarke did, and he has proved a more than capable tutor.

“I have a great rapport with the manager,” Lukaku told reporters back in December. “He challenges me mentally. If I don't play, it's challenging me to do more. I want to develop.”

And develop he has. Despite occasionally finding starting opportunities limited, the Belgian has netted 12 Premier League goals this season – five more than Torres. He also appears to be a man in form, with five of those strikes coming in his last six league appearances.

By taking such a laissez faire approach to Lukaku’s continuing adaptation to English football, Chelsea can now take no credit for his progress. Yet it need not have been this way. For over the past six months, the prodigiously gifted 19-year-old has shown enough to at least prompt some at Stamford Bridge to wonder whether he could have been more than a wide-eyed understudy this term.

Lukaku would have at least provided stiffer competition for Torres than the injury-prone and untrusted Daniel Sturridge, or the masked incarnation of Demba Ba which already seems a shadow of his lethal Newcastle best. On simple merit, he would even have supplanted the faded Spaniard.

Of course, all logic suggests Roman Abramovich would have shown no greater tolerance towards Lukaku benching Torres than he did to Didier Drogba last summer. Anyone who gets in the way of the £50m man trying to play his way back into form is swiftly discarded, and Benitez was appointed almost solely because of his body of work with the striker at Liverpool.

But Roberto Di Matteo would probably have appreciated the political problems posed by the presence of an in-form Lukaku. His unwavering selection of Drogba during last season’s miraculous Champions League run suggests a man willing to challenge his owner’s misguided obsession for the good of the team.

There is reason, too, to suggest that Lukaku might have improved Chelsea’s fortunes as first-choice striker. While comparisons with Drogba are over-simplistic, the similarities are there for all to see. He may lack experience, but the young Belgian boasts the physique of a heavyweight boxer, as well as possessing far greater pace than the big Ivorian.

Lukaku is remarkable in that his skill set allows him to both stretch defences which press high – as Juventus did on that fateful night in Turin – and dismantle those which sit deep. In addition, he would almost certainly have made better use of the service provided by the likes of Juan Mata, Hazard and Oscar than Torres has because, put bluntly, almost any decent striker could.

Had Lukaku scored freely and led his side to victory against domestic and European opposition, Abramovich would have been put in a difficult situation. For all his desire to remove Di Matteo, it is difficult to justify sacking a manager on a winning run, and even the Russian has never done it.  

Moreover, for all the faith and money the Chelsea owner has put in Torres, Lukaku also represents a considerable investment, and one which should be have an even greater bearing on the direction of the club over the next decade. Stifling a blossoming youngster in favour of a 28-year-old many believe to be in terminal decline would have been a huge strategic error even by his low standards.

Ultimately, though, we will never know. Di Matteo was denied Lukaku’s burgeoning talents and eventually dismissed. Torres remains listless even at the familiar promptings of Benitez as the 19-year-old occupies himself with scoring goals and winning matches for West Brom. Now he wants to stay.

“I've had a lot of contact with Chelsea and I've told them I'm happy here,” he added back in December. “For me, it is a one-year loan. Then it may be another year again because I need to play as much as I can. I can learn here. I can improve here.” Only not this weekend.

Follow Liam Twomey on